September 25, 2008

The Last Hurrah

To any mildly objective observer, it has by now become clear that the Clintons have embraced the defeat of their political party’s presidential candidate for the good of their personal ambitions.  Hillary and Bill Clinton have refused to strongly criticize the McCain campaign, they have declined to extensively campaign for Obama, and they have lionized the Republican Party candidates.

To recap:

- Hillary Clinton cheered on the Palin VP selection as a “historic nomination”, implicitly endorsing the “vote for a woman” argument.

- Hillary publicly announced that she would be do only limited campaigning for Obama, holding up commitments to campaign in senatorial races as a conflict.  That she is willing to campaign for Democrats but only a limited amount for Barack underlines how unwilling she is to throw her political capital behind her one-time foe.

- Bill Clinton, on Letterman, played up John McCain’s heroic war record and suggested that this would be an important consideration for voters in the ballot booth.  Not a very subtle hint to the supposed horde of bitter Hillary voters, next guest Chris Rock noted.

- Bill Clinton defended John McCain’s slightly erratic and pointless decision to stop his campaign because of the finance crisis.  Clinton said that his decision to postpone the debate was “in good faith”, lending credence to McCain’s political stunt by referring to another one of McCain’s crazy stunt proposals.

The Clintons are seriously embittered by their defeat in the primary.  Perhaps their refusal to help Barack is strategic, perhaps it is sullen irresponsibility.  But it seems to be in vain – if public opinion and the media’s tenor do not change drastically, an Obama victory looks inevitable.  Unless the Hillary Clinton plans to run on the Republican ticket in 2012, all her groundwork is for nought. 

But, on the other hand, what does she stand to lose?  Unlike Lieberman, she hasn’t betrayed her party on any issue tangible enough to justify her actual expulsion from the Democratic party.  And if she did choose to eventually run as a Republican, I might even vote for her if she dropped healthcare from her platform and revised her tax policy!

said Wallace Forman @ 3:28 PM. Comments (0)

September 6, 2008

Clinton’s Silence Not Unnoticed

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , ,

Somebody over at the Washington Post also notices how strangely quiet Clinton has been:

Clinton has been surprisingly quiet in the days since Palin was nominated. She issued a bland statement the day McCain announced his surprise pick: “We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin’s historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain. While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate.” Last Thursday, Clinton put out just her second statement about Palin, saying she wanted to “slightly amend” one of her best zingers in Denver: “No way, no how, no McCain-Palin.” And while Clinton is scheduled to stump in central Florida Monday on Sen. Barack Obama’s behalf, the trip is not, according to people in both Democrats’ camps, designed as a direct response to the debut of the second female vice presidential nominee in U.S. history.

It doesn’t exactly add up to a resounding attack, especially during the heat of the campaign. Former Clinton advisers offer various explanations: She would only energize the Republican base if she criticized Palin; she doesn’t want to diminish her own stature by attacking McCain’s rookie understudy rather than McCain himself; she is not on the ticket, so why should she intervene? Still, the result is a strange silence from the woman who, until just two weeks ago, had arguably the most powerful female voice in American politics.

I expect her upcoming campaign tour will be similarly mellow.  I wouldn’t be surprised if she softens any attacks she makes with lines like “no matter who wins, this will be a historic election.”  Her focus will likely be on how, “McCain’s policies are wrong for America” rather than how “Palin’s policies are wrong for women”. Clinton in 2012?

Even that plan is tenuous.  Obama is a hugely important figure on the political scene these days.  He wasn’t a halfhearted pick from a slate of old faces like Kerry.  His rise was a momentous and inspiring event to his supporters.  People are unlikely to forget him the way they quickly forgot much-unloved Kerry.  Clinton faces an uphill battle if she hopes to capture the 2012 Democratic nomination.  In 2008, at least, I wish her the best.

said Wallace Forman @ 11:57 AM. Comments (0)

September 5, 2008

Priorities in Line

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , ,

Clinton is too busy to devote much time campaigning for Barack Obama, apparently… because she’ll be campaigning for Democrats she actually wants to win an election:

Advisers to Clinton, who has been on vacation this week, said that she stands ready to help the Obama-Biden ticket, but they urged not to overestimate the effect she could have, noting that she had other commitments this fall, like campaigning and raising money for Senate candidates.

said Wallace Forman @ 11:39 PM. Comments (0)

August 29, 2008

Clinton Voters for Palin

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , ,

If Obama was counting on Hillary to interfere with McCain’s attempt to grab her supporters, I’m sure he was disappointed by her first statement about Palin:

“We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin’s historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain,” Clinton, the first woman to win a presidential primary, said in the statement. “While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate.”

Subtext: those of you who supported my campaign because I was a woman should support Palin now.

What a ruthless politician.

said Wallace Forman @ 5:20 PM. Comments (0)