November 2, 2008

Lest We Forget

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , , , ,

In 2004 the United States was faced with a choice between repudiating the Iraq war and “staying the course” – between John Kerry and George W. Bush.  At the time it was unclear what that choice entailed – certainly Kerry tried to defuse concerns that he would abandon Iraq.

“I fear that in the run-up to the 2004 election the administration is considering what is tantamount to a cut-and-run strategy,” Kerry said in remarks prepared for delivery to the Council on Foreign Relations.

The Massachusetts senator accused Bush and his aides of a “sudden embrace of accelerated Iraqification and American troop withdrawal without adequate stability,” which he called “an invitation to failure.”

But given his vague rhetoric, Kerry’s criticism of the war had to lead people to believe that he was more likely to withdraw.  And so, in some part, the 2004 election became a referendum on whether or not we should remain in Iraq.

If we had thought that Bush would remain in Iraq, we were right.  If we had thought that Kerry would soon want to withdraw, we were also right.

“The way forward in Iraq is not to pull out precipitously or merely promise to stay ‘as long as it takes,’ ” Kerry said during an address at Georgetown University. “We must instead simultaneously pursue both a political settlement and the withdrawal of American combat forces.”

Under Kerry’s plan, the first wave of U.S soldiers would leave after Iraq’s planned Dec. 15 parliamentary elections, with the “bulk of American combat forces” withdrawn by the end of 2006.

And if President Bush thought that continued American efforts in Iraq could eventually bring stability, he may have been right too.

The jury is still out, of course.  There are no last words in history, after all – just one final Last Word.

The Bush administration has made many mistakes in its prosecution of the war.  It is not a libertarian administration, and it has not governed as one.  There have been many failures in the last four years that even conservatives rightly regret.

But, lest we forget, Bush did not fail in his most important task.  Democracy still stands in Iraq, where there was none before.  And it stands in spite, not because, of the more “realistic” advice of the man who may soon be our next president.

said Wallace Forman @ 5:28 PM. Comments (0)

September 6, 2008

Clinton’s Silence Not Unnoticed

Filed under: Uncategorized — Tags: , , , ,

Somebody over at the Washington Post also notices how strangely quiet Clinton has been:

Clinton has been surprisingly quiet in the days since Palin was nominated. She issued a bland statement the day McCain announced his surprise pick: “We should all be proud of Governor Sarah Palin’s historic nomination, and I congratulate her and Senator McCain. While their policies would take America in the wrong direction, Governor Palin will add an important new voice to the debate.” Last Thursday, Clinton put out just her second statement about Palin, saying she wanted to “slightly amend” one of her best zingers in Denver: “No way, no how, no McCain-Palin.” And while Clinton is scheduled to stump in central Florida Monday on Sen. Barack Obama’s behalf, the trip is not, according to people in both Democrats’ camps, designed as a direct response to the debut of the second female vice presidential nominee in U.S. history.

It doesn’t exactly add up to a resounding attack, especially during the heat of the campaign. Former Clinton advisers offer various explanations: She would only energize the Republican base if she criticized Palin; she doesn’t want to diminish her own stature by attacking McCain’s rookie understudy rather than McCain himself; she is not on the ticket, so why should she intervene? Still, the result is a strange silence from the woman who, until just two weeks ago, had arguably the most powerful female voice in American politics.

I expect her upcoming campaign tour will be similarly mellow.  I wouldn’t be surprised if she softens any attacks she makes with lines like “no matter who wins, this will be a historic election.”  Her focus will likely be on how, “McCain’s policies are wrong for America” rather than how “Palin’s policies are wrong for women”. Clinton in 2012?

Even that plan is tenuous.  Obama is a hugely important figure on the political scene these days.  He wasn’t a halfhearted pick from a slate of old faces like Kerry.  His rise was a momentous and inspiring event to his supporters.  People are unlikely to forget him the way they quickly forgot much-unloved Kerry.  Clinton faces an uphill battle if she hopes to capture the 2012 Democratic nomination.  In 2008, at least, I wish her the best.

said Wallace Forman @ 11:57 AM. Comments (0)